Blizzard attributes the design of Overwatch’s more alluring heroes to “technical hurdles,” while fans urge developers to prioritize addressing the “same face syndrome.”
Weekly updates, stories from your favorite gaming communities, and more
You’re now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Looking to add more newsletters?
Get your weekly dose of everything you need to know about the games you love, upcoming titles we think you’ll enjoy, and stories from the vibrant communities that support them.
Our dedicated GTA 6 newsletter brings you the latest news, insider insights, and rumor breakdowns from the experts in the field.
From the minds behind Edge: A weekly newsletter focused on the gaming industry, featuring analysis from seasoned writers, advice from industry professionals, and a look at what’s coming next.
Tech enthusiasts, join our free tech newsletter for a weekly roundup of the latest innovations, cutting-edge gadgets, and much more.
Subscribe to our new Switch 2 newsletter, where we keep you updated on Nintendo’s latest console each week, share the news, and recommend must-play games.
Receive a weekly summary of the most important movie and TV news, delivered straight to your inbox. From exclusive trailers to interviews and reviews, we’ve got you covered.
Get sneak peeks, exclusive contests, and details about special events every month!
Developers have clarified that Overwatch’s character designs aren’t becoming more conventionally attractive for the reasons fans might assume, yet complaints persist about the similarities in character face models.
It’s well-known that Overwatch’s roster has leaned towards more traditionally attractive designs over time. Characters like Roadhog and Zarya, alongside Junkrat and Mei, initially showcased a diverse range of body types and silhouettes, including unique characters like a talking gorilla and a robot monk.
However, since the transition to Overwatch 2, now simply Overwatch, new heroes have largely conformed to typical shooter archetypes. Most are young, fit, and tall, sporting faces that could grace magazine covers (or be featured in countless cosmetic options).
Senior producer Kenny Hudson explains that these attractive body types stem from technical requirements rather than a desire to create endless eye candy. “When designing our heroes, we consider how to make them unique while ensuring they have a solid platform in terms of proportion, height, and scale. This helps us build cosmetics and future-proof our designs while avoiding technical challenges,” Hudson states.
He adds, “Longer limbs, taller legs, and a larger core actually make it easier for our artists to add new geometry to these models.”
Hudson also assures that the character creation process has been improved since the introduction of Wrecking Ball, which posed significant challenges for the team, making it easier to design characters that don’t fit the typical mold.
Despite this, the issue of homogenized faces remains. Players on social media have pointed out the striking similarities between the new DPS character Anran and the established supports Kiriko and Juno, coining the term “same face syndrome.”
One post even notes that Anran’s face model appeared more distinct when she was first revealed last year, featuring a stronger jawline and sharper eyes, but now seems to have succumbed to the “Kirikofication” effect.
Last year, the developers expressed their continued love for the quirky characters of Overwatch, and we recently got a glimpse of that with the introduction of the Jetpack Cat hero.
“Marvel Rivals is the best thing to happen to Overwatch”: Fans react to Blizzard’s significant changes and the addition of 10 new heroes, expressing gratitude to a competing shooter for fostering healthy competition.
| Rank | Player | Score | Time |
|---|
