Magic Will Not Feature Harry Potter Crossover Despite Recent Major Deal Announcement

Starting next year, Hasbro will roll out a variety of Harry Potter-themed toys worldwide. Despite this major licensing agreement with Warner Bros. and the Harry Potter franchise, Wizards of the Coast has confirmed that there are currently no plans to integrate the wizarding world into Magic: The Gathering.

On February 10, Hasbro and Warner Bros. Discovery announced a significant licensing deal that will position Hasbro as the primary manufacturer of toys and merchandise for the Harry Potter franchise by 2027. The company intends to produce and sell a range of products, including dolls, role-play items, action figures, collectibles, interactive plush toys, and board games, with more details expected later this year. This is a substantial move for Hasbro, especially with a new Harry Potter series set to debut on HBO Max next year, likely anticipating a surge in interest in the beloved franchise.

In response to a Reddit post discussing Hasbro’s new licensing agreements, a representative from Wizards of the Coast stated that there are no plans for a Harry Potter crossover, despite the parent company’s involvement. “The Magic Multiverse has its own school of Magic at Strixhaven with plenty of secrets still to explore,” the community team noted on Reddit. “Our Universes Beyond roadmap currently doesn’t have us visiting any others.”

It’s hard to discuss Harry Potter without mentioning its creator, J.K. Rowling, who has faced significant backlash for her comments regarding trans individuals and has used her resources to support anti-trans initiatives.

This context has led some Magic fans, particularly those who have enjoyed the recent IP crossover cards from the Universes Beyond brand, to speculate whether the card game would soon feature Harry Potter cards as part of this new deal. However, Wizards of the Coast’s statement suggests that, for the time being, Harry Potter will not be making its way into Magic. Of course, plans can evolve, and the ambiguity in WOTC’s wording leaves room for future developments that could render this comment outdated.