Bethesda’s lead highlights the key storytelling differences between fantasy RPGs like Skyrim and sci-fi RPGs like Fallout.

Emil Pagliarulo, a writer known for his work on Fallout and Elder Scrolls, has shared insights into the distinct writing styles of these two iconic series, highlighting why Fallout can present a more complex narrative challenge.

In the expansive worlds of Bethesda’s Fallout and Elder Scrolls, players face numerous choices, especially in titles like Fallout: New Vegas, where various factions compete for your allegiance. The moral landscape is often murky, making it tough to determine the best path for humanity—though siding with Caesar’s Legion is a clear no-go.

Pagliarulo noted that fantasy settings like The Elder Scrolls often present a more straightforward narrative, stating, “In a fantasy game, there’s usually a clear big bad evil.” He pointed out that the lines between good and evil can be more pronounced in these games. In contrast, Fallout’s narrative is filled with moral ambiguity. He remarked, “In Fallout 4, particularly with the Brotherhood and the Institute, you find yourself questioning their motives—’maybe they have a point.'”

He elaborated on the Institute’s role, asking, “Are the synths just machines? Do they deserve freedom?” Meanwhile, he described the Brotherhood as “a bunch of hard asses,” prompting the question of whether humanity should control technology that it misuses.

These thought-provoking dilemmas are part of what makes the Fallout series so captivating, as I dive into my fifth playthrough of New Vegas.